TPO 28
The lecturer and the reading discuss Robert E.Preary claims about to reach the North Pole. Although the passage claims that Robert claims are true and it brings several reasons, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the National Geographic Society sent a committee for searched about Robert claims, and they said it is correct. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the members of a committee of the National Geographic Society were close friends of Robert; hence, it is not objective. Also, they searched only for 2 days. Therefore, it is not fair and carefully.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that Robert reached the north in 37 days as the same as Ellesmere; hence, Robert claims is true. The professor argues that Robert reaches is different from Ellesmere reaches in important ways. Ellens carry much less weight with herself because his food was carried and transfer by air plain. She adds that the weather condition of Ellesmere reaches was better than the Roberts reaches; hence, the speed of the Ellesmere was more that the Roberts speed.
Finally, although the passage says that measured shadow angles in the Peary’s pictures from his journey confirm that he reached the North Pole, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that Peary took those photos one hundred years ago, and the shadows in the pictures have become blurred. So, even the most accurate technics for measuring the shadow angles in the pictures could not prove his claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Preary
...cturer and the reading discuss Robert E.Preary claims about to reach the North Pole. A...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18461538462 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.365944274 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4126410323 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316416067389 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100827965979 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079029312655 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167961078183 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587861111791 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.