TPO 29
In the lecture, the professor holds an opinion that the reasons of migration is unconvincing, which is opposite from the articles claims there are a few support for the migration hypothesis.
Initially, the professor illustrates that the edmontosaur do not have to migrate for food. The weather of hundred million years ago is warmer than today. And in the summer, the sunshine is sufficiant for plants to grow. Therefore, the edmontosaur could eat the dead plant to survive. This directly contradicts what the reading states that in cold winter, the edmontosaur had no food because plants do not grow and they needed to migrate for food.
After that, the speaker points out that the edmontosaur lived in herds that dose not mean they migrate.Some animals live in herds protecting from predators, such as elk which live in herd but not migrate.This also different from the reading, which indicates that many edmontosaur skeletons were buried in the same place, so they live in herds and migrate.
Finally, the professor asserts that the junior edmontosaurs are not able to move long distances. Since they live in herds, they would not leave the junior alone. They live in cold north slope. This counters the reading passage's idea that the edmontosaur is able to migrate long distances, so they could migrate to warmer area in winter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun support seems to be countable; consider using: 'few supports'.
Suggestion: few supports
...te from the articles claims there are a few support for the migration hypothesis. Init...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...n herds that dose not mean they migrate.Some animals live in herds protecting from p...
^^^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... elk which live in herd but not migrate.This also different from the reading, which ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07657657658 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65169968906 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54954954955 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.7848609851 49.2860985944 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.454545455 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389587219715 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14562812422 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701422325493 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216812079799 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481241684856 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.