TPO36
As the society developed, the education achieved great success. Not only does university education but also young children education developed rapidly. As far as I’m concerned, the university education needs more funding than fundamental education and the reasons why are as followed.
First of all, the cost of university is more costly than the primary schools or kindergartens, which university spend lots of money on devices and so on. Take my major as an example, the psychology, needs millions of RMBs to buy a devices detecting brains’ waves not alone other majors like chemistry. It is a huge cost compared to the cost of facilities of fundamental education. Building a primary school is relatively cheaper because only millions of RMB can build a nice campus. However, this is impossible to build a university. Therefore, the funding investing in universities is more suitable.
Besides, in the parents perspectives, they are willing to spend money on young children rather than adult kids. In some major cities of China, parents put millions on buying houses which are near key schools while barely parents would buy houses near their children’s universities. Furthermore, extra-curriculum courses are popular among young children but not among adult kids. Money is seldom spent on adult kids beyond their tuition fees. Without extra money on academy, university students are looking forward to funding.
Indeed, most of universities receive a donation from home and aboard, and students also have a loan from the bank, which will reduce their stress. However, the amount of expense of a university is so large that funding is needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | catherine0915 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | gliphes | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 9, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the universities') or simply say ''most universities''.
Suggestion: most of the universities; most universities
... forward to funding. Indeed, most of universities receive a donation from home and aboard...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, look, so, therefore, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 264.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10054943441 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5875627631 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.375 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.