TPO 3 integrated
The article states that the painting could not be a real work by Rembrandt and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that it was painted by him and refutes each of the essay's reasons.
First, the reading stats that the woman in the portrait is dressed a servant's like coat but the coat has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. The lecturer refutes this idea by saying that the fur collar was added to the original portrait 100 years after painting by Rembrandt. Perhaps someone wanted to increase the quality of it.
Second, the article explains that the performance of light and shadow is not as good as Rembrandt's paintings while he was master of them. However, the lecture opposes the reason and stats that the light and shadow were added in later time. She explains that the light color in the original picture is very realistic.,
Finally, the article climes that the portrait was painted on several pieces of wood which is unusual in Rembrandt's works. The professor refutes this by saying that the original painting was on a single piece of wood and then by the second artist has changed.
- TPO 3 integrated 3
- TPO 3 integrated 50
- TPO ind 4 3
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a servant' or simply 'servants'?
Suggestion: a servant; servants
...at the woman in the portrait is dressed a servants like coat but the coat has a luxurious ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the original picture is very realistic., Finally, the article climes that the por...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31962829809 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 419.366225166 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5205837914 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.