TPO 32
The reading specifies that submarines who patrolling in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean hear strange sounds and provide three theories about what might have caused the odd sounds. However, the professor say that author's theories have certain problems and introduce three reasons and refute them all.
First of all, the reading assert that the strange sounds is produce by male and female orca. In fact, the orca live in that area and use this sound to attract male. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this idea reasoning that orca population do not live in a deep water and its habitats are near surface. Therefore, the sumarines who are in a deep water cannot hear their sounds and also if the orca spread this voice, sonar can detect it.
Second, based on the reading, giand squids are responsible for quack noises and the reason the sonar cannot detect them is because they have soft bodies with no skeleton. Moreover, giant squids are intelligent animal and it is plausible they have the ability to emit wierd sound. In contrast, the professor states that the strange noises disappear after a time and giant squids still living in that area and it is not rational for submarine to think this sounds suddenly stops. Therefore, if the source of quckers was the squid, it would have been continued thereafter.
Third, according to the reading, foreign submarine from other countries patrolling the area and unintentionally they emit sounds. Conversely, the lecturer contradicts this point by saying that the strange sounds move around and change direction rapidly. Submarine do not have technology to alter their direction quickly and also they do not have silence engine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...the reason the sonar cannot detect them is because they have soft bodies with no skeleton....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, third, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06498194946 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45205295583 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6568125892 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456929954307 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158214238077 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737925805146 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264362038424 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074260818676 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.