TPO 34-1
The passage talks about the possible theories of sea caw extinction. The author of the reading claims the three different theories; however, The professor holds a various idea and refuting reasons provided in the passage.
First, the reading mentions that one of the main reasons which cause the number of sea cows decrease can be attributed to the over hunting. The native Siberian people's demand to supply necessary food validate this theory. While, The professor casts doubt on the reality of the hunting of the sea cow more than need. He points that one sea cow have had 9 meter length and more than 10 ton weight, therefore, one sea cow could be enough for the people maybe until 1 month. As a result, people do not have required hunt the sea cow too need.
In addition, the passage says that climate change and ecosystem alteration before 1768 cause plants diminishing which sea cows have eat them for surviving. In the other word, decreasing the food for feed led to sea cow population decline. In contrast, the professor argues that if the climate change has happened before 1768 so we expected to observe decreasing in the other kinds of plants in that area. Meanwhile, if other types of plants had reduced, we would have missed many marine animals which feed them; whereas, there is not any evidence for this situation.
As a final point, according to the reading, European had started sea cow hunting as a fur trade. On the contrary, the listening rebuts the statement by pointing out that the sea cow extinction have been started lone before European beginning to fur trade. He indicates that this reason can justify that this theory could not be true.
In conclusion, the professor refused all reasons which supported in the reading by his opinion and perception.
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 83
- TPO24-2: One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 73
- TPO-27-2: If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly necessary food validate this theory. While, The professor casts doubt on the reali...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to need'?
Suggestion: to need
...e do not have required hunt the sea cow too need. In addition, the passage says that ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
... plants diminishing which sea cows have eat them for surviving. In the other word, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...feed led to sea cow population decline. In contrast, the professor argues that if ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.284023668639 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.158904122519 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0621301775148 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0266272189349 0.0435111971325 61% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0207100591716 0.0277247811725 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133136094675 0.128828473217 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0562130177515 0.0370669169778 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43764703868 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0177514792899 0.0208969081088 85% => OK
Particles: 0.00591715976331 0.00154638098197 383% => OK
Determiners: 0.12426035503 0.128158765124 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0147928994083 0.0158828679856 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0118343195266 0.0114777025283 103% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1785.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 271.125827815 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85245901639 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35737704918 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255737704918 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173770491803 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101639344262 0.113142543107 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43764703868 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547540983607 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 57.1391735825 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.3333333333 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9958556237 49.3711431718 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 132.220823453 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 45.9071038251 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.35294117647 1.90840788429 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.712674355917 0.549887131256 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.140750709368 0.142949733639 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0975970459598 0.0787303798458 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.624376775816 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182537214094 0.139662658121 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.315864869189 0.266732575781 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150083540053 0.103435571967 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.308997585965 0.414875509568 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.115796832886 0.0530846634433 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.450743611989 0.40443939384 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126889042893 0.0528353158467 240% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.