TPO 35
Voyanich in 1912 acquired an illustrated handwriting book with an unknown script. The article provides three theories that explain the origin of the Voyanich manuscript. However, the professor explains that all the three reasons are not authentic and rejects all of them.
The first theory explains in the text is that the book is on a genuine work on some scientific issue that is based on a complex secret code. The professor opposes this point by saying that Voyanich was an ordinary person, if he wanted to sell his book to reach people, he would definitely wrote it in a simple script.
Second, according to reading the book may be a fake by Voyanich, and there were other fake books like this that it's author just wanted to sell and attain money. On the contrary, the lecturer states that Voynich took a lot of care on the writing of the book, if he decided to sale a fake book he would make it simpler.
Third, the article claims that it is may a fake book made by Wilfrid, he made it and wanted to sale it as a mysterious old book. In contrast, the professor mentions that the ink that is used in the book is about 4000 years ago, so it is not made by Wilfrid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'write'
Suggestion: write
...ok to reach people, he would definitely wrote it in a simple script. Second, accordi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41013824885 5.08290768461 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36015794301 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3974914465 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 53.8541721854 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 12.2367328918 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.