tpo 36
Preventing hail in rural areas of the United States is controversial according to the article and lecture. The article states that cloud seeding is a method which has proven to be successful; the professor, in contrast, claims that this evidence is not sufficient to prove that this technique is effective.
The professor begins the lecture by stating that the chemicals used to seed the clouds can also cause the delay or absence of rain. Although the chemicals are used to promote rainfall and lessen the chance of hail, they might also cause the clouds to not release their moisture. This would cause the crops on farms to die from droughts, and the point of the technique is to limit crop losses for farmers.
Asian countries are said to have used this method to control hail. The professor, however, explains that this method works well in urban environments due to the presence of pollutants. In rural farming areas, this method might not work. The lack of pollution would limit the effectiveness of cloud seeding.
There have also been reports of hail decreasing in areas where clouds have been seeded. The lecturer claims that these results also showed that the surrounding areas also had reduced hail. This seems to indicate that the reduction of hail in one year might have been caused by changes in the weather and cannot be used to show that cloud seeding actually reduces dangerous hail storms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | HideAPumpkin | 75 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | whiteflower | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Mizanur | 40 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | alibenvari | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Preventing hail in rural areas of the United States is cont...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, so, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53267608118 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0605730413 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969806235486 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417983057706 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431331882182 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601727564813 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360846359623 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.