The reading and the passage are both contradicting with each other, in terms of cloud seeding method and its effects on the hail. The author of the reading states that researchers have found cloud seeding is a successful method in reducing hail in which they have tried using sodium iodide on cloud in order to form snow from hail. However, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim mentioned in the article and refutes all the theories about cloud seeding presented in the passage.
First of all, according to the reading laboratory experiment was effective. When scientists have tried to added sodium iodide into cold water, the light snow formed instead of hail which would in support of the theory of cloud seeding. On the contrary, the speaker negates all the arguments presented in the passage. Furthermore, he added that since iodine prevents all type of precipitation, that might create a risk of drought in farmland if cloud seeding would have used in the area where water is not enough in farmland.
Secondly, the author posits that cloud seeding would be beneficial in the farms at the United States as it has been already tested in the Asia where the method was used to control precipitation in the urban areas. Although The lecturer refutes this by asserting that pollutant particles might get interact with clouds and chemicals in some polluted Asian countries. However, it may not work similarly in the unpolluted farmland in the United States.
Finally, it is mentioned in the article that local studies have found reducing hail damage in present days compared to the early days. On the other hand, the speaker states that the whole region was found with reducing damage by hail. Thus, it was not necessarily the effect of cloud seeding method.
- TPO 13 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- When you face difficult problems in life what do you feel is the best way to solve them asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 84
- TPO35 3
- TPO 46Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 28- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international cel 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had used'?
Suggestion: had used
...of drought in farmland if cloud seeding would have used in the area where water is not enough i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94276094276 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46107448469 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.881160547 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0360479935475 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154822421695 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0175380304919 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0221800954716 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017764564997 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.