Tpo-38-1
The reading suggests tree reasons for developing an international fund to help developing countries implement beneficial conservation programs. While the professor believes that these reasons are unconvincing and rejects them.
Firstly, the text claims that dispersing these funds to governments and land owners will help agricultural areas from being developed into environmentally damaging industries. However, the professor claims that agricultural industries alone have put presser on forest, because some modern techniques such as fertilizers for improving harvest have polluted water can lead to deforestation which is is more harmful that logging industries.
Secondly, although, the text claims that this protection fund can be used to develop the economies of village, the professor explains that there are no guaranties to forest owners resist against tempting offering of industries to convert their forest land to the industries lands.
Eventually, the reading claims that this protection fund can help to biodiversity, However the lecture elucidates that in this solution people just will grow commercial plants neither protect species nor protect forest diversity.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Essay topics: TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO-34-1 78
- Tpo 32-2 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...eveloping an international fund to help developing countries implement beneficial conserva...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons are unconvincing and rejects them. Firstly, the text claims that dispersing...
^^^
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...d water can lead to deforestation which is is more harmful that logging industries. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more harmful that logging industries. Secondly, although, the text claims that...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r forest land to the industries lands. Eventually, the reading claims that this...
^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t species nor protect forest diversity.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 169.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00591715976 5.08290768461 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99181334573 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656804733728 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.0531196495 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.166666667 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.3589403974 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.8541721854 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.2367328918 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.