The reading passage and the lecture have a discussion about ways to protect oak trees from P.ramorum. The author mentions three potential theories. On the contrary, the professor considers none of them would be effective with certainty.
First, the reading passage suggests that stopping P.ramorum from spreading is a good way. However, the opinion has been opposed by the professor with new proof. The professor says that the particles that P.ramorum produces can be carried by rainwater and stream, so it can hardly be stopped just by preventing humans. Thus, the opinion has been challenged heavily.
Moreover, the author claims that injecting fungicidal chemicals can protect oak trees. On the other hand, the lecturer states that the chemical injection will only remain for a short time, and the protection is not likely to cover the entire forest. In other words, the option of utilizing chemicals is not realistic.
Finally, the author believes that removing diseased oak trees and trees around it is a useful way, while the professor in the listening material maintains that some of the tree species are extremely unique in North America, and cutting them down will cause ecological issues.
Therefore, the speaker departs totally from the opinions on the topic made in the reading.
- Essay topics TPO 45 Integrated Writing Task 70
- TPO 39 Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO32 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future ofsociety as a whole 76
- TPO47 Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs we 70
- TPO42 Integrated Writing 70
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 210 250
No. of Characters: 1053 1200
No. of Different Words: 129 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.014 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.476 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.603 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.629 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.055 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4