Tpo -3
Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.
The reading and lecture are both about a dutch painting of Rembrandt. The author feels that after examine the style, the arrangement of the portrait it can express that it is not the painting of the Rembrandt. The lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. He is on the opinion that the painting is true by thoroughly examining the various fact.
To begin with, the author argues that the women of the portrait wore cloth with fur collar which was a very luxurious dress and a servant could not possibly afford it. He also that Rembrandt always good at specific detail how he can make this mistake. However, the specific argument challenged by the lecturer. He mentions that e-ray showed that fur collar is the part of the painting. Additionally, he says that some made the change to make the painting more worthy.
Second, the writer suggests that less coherent between the colour and Rembrandt never did that mistake. He also mentioned that dark colour appears in the face instead of reflecting on the face. However, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that the colour is removed from the face and in original picture light colour reflect the face. The light and shadow on the original picture are very realistic.
Finally, the author posits that behind the picture piece of woods were attached with the glue. He also states that Rembrandt always used panel glue together for the painting. In contrast, the lecturer position is that research showed that the wood panel is from another painting. He also noted that Rembrandt always made the painting on a single wood panel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | f.jafary66@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | sandeshbhandari2 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | shingwa | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Suthasith | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Chara | 60 | view |
- Animal fossils 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-timejob. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- tpo 13Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown i 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statementIf people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15% over the last three years, whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small, general practice firms. Even though large firms usually 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...press that it is not the painting of the Rembrandt. The lecturer challenged the c...
^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is not the painting of the Rembrandt. The lecturer challenged the claim made by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87084870849 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3720824679 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490774907749 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4222874047 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6470588235 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16283163825 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599717399766 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683135065331 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106808724961 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071607622422 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.