TPO 40
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is that whether human presence at Venus is possible or not. Considering this, the author offers three issues to indicate that maintaining a human presence at Venus is impossible. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the ways the reading just discussed. The lecturer demonstrates three reasons to reject the points in the passage.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that due to atmospheric pressure at Venus's surface, anything crush. As stated by the professor, establishing a station floating on the Venus's atmosphere rather than being at the planet's surface can solve this problem. It is proven that the more we go away from the surface, the more pressure decreases. So, it will not be dangerous for people to be on the station, which is 50 kilometer away from the planet's surface.
Moreover, unlike the reading which claims that owing to the fact that there is no water reservoir and oxygen at Venus, we are required to fulfill the demand of people from the Earth, which is not possible, the professor illustrates that there are a great amount of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid at Venus's atmosphere, and there is a chemical process by which we can make oxygen and water from carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. Therefore, humans at Venus can easily obtain water and oxygen, and there is no need to import them from Earth.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the reading that humans cannot have electricity to power their machines and equipment, thanks to lack of light at the planet, saying that it is true that a little amount of light reaches to the surface of the planet; however, the clouds which are 50 kilometers away from the Venus's surface are not thick, and the aforementioned station can use from both the light reflected from the clouds and the sunlight hitting atmosphere. Hence, people can produce more than enough electricity to power their machines and equipment.
All in all, the professor maintains that even though presenting humans at the Venus is challenging, the arguments mentioned in the passage are not convincing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-16 | mojtaba_aam | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older than when you are young 55
- Most advertisements make the product seem much better than it really is. 73
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 73
- successful people try new things and takes risks. 78
- TPO 48 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to reject the points in the passage. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...eople to be on the station, which is 50 kilometer away from the planets surface. More...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilometer away from the planets surface. Moreover, unlike the reading which claim...
^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ssor illustrates that there are a great amount of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid at ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245192307692 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.146634615385 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0576923076923 0.0723426182421 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0576923076923 0.0435111971325 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0216346153846 0.0277247811725 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127403846154 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0384615384615 0.0370669169778 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59647421217 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0288461538462 0.0208969081088 138% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.137019230769 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0168269230769 0.0158828679856 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144230769231 0.0114777025283 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2243.0 1645.83664459 136% => OK
No of words: 377.0 271.125827815 139% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94960212202 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.04852973271 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376657824934 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254641909814 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.167108753316 0.187439937562 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103448275862 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59647421217 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490716180371 0.539623497131 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.3441005247 53.8517498576 97% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.7502111507 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 122.861301508 49.3711431718 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.538461538 132.220823453 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 21.7502111507 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.878197800319 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 54.4641909814 50.5018328374 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.81914893617 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.689891416635 0.549887131256 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.182424927694 0.142949733639 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0950175191539 0.0787303798458 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.709738132911 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180684981143 0.139662658121 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.335502788174 0.266732575781 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120212721829 0.103435571967 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.414302364824 0.414875509568 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0886563264897 0.0530846634433 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.478409388852 0.40443939384 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081887488885 0.0528353158467 155% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.