TPO 40 Integrated
The lecture and the passage both discuss the hospitability conditions on Venus planet, which adapting different stances toward this issue. In this regard, the passage claims that conditions on Venus are so extreme that make it inhospitable. The lecturer, on the other hand, does not agree with the ideas brought up by the passage and offers some counterclaims to refute them.
First of all, both the author and lecturer talk about atmosphere pressure on Venus' surface. The author argues that the pressure at Venus' surface is much greater than Earth's surface pressure. As a result, this high magnitude of pressure on Venus may have effect on equipment on its surface. For instance, spacecraft that are landed on its surface have been crushed. Conversely, the professor subscribes to the idea that by establishing an station which is located roughly 5 kilometers out of atmosphere, the problem of pressure would be solved and there –would be no danger. Because on higher location from Venus' surface the pressure is lower.
Furthermore, both the passage and the lecture discuss the issue of water on Venus. The reading goes on to mention that there is no reservoirs of water and also no oxygen. So it makes it impossible for establishing a station and living there. On the contrary, the lecturer supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; he describes that there are compounds of mineral gasses. So we can make a process to make water out of these compounds. It is not necessary to import water.
Eventually, the passage and the lecture both discuss the degree of sunlight reaches on Venus' surface. The author states that very little sunlight reaches the Venus' surface because of dense clouds. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects the author's view and illustrate the idea that there are clouds on planet but there are not thick. Hence, the sunlight can go through it. He also suggests that we can establish a station to collect solar power and also generate more electricity in this way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | benyamin | view | |
| 2023-03-16 | sonyeoso | 45 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | porteghale Abi | view | |
| 2022-09-05 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | Pariakarimi | view |
- TPO 40 Independent 3
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends. a. joining a sports team, b. participating in community activities, c. traveling. 70
- TPO 49Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 70
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...cribes to the idea that by establishing an station which is located roughly 5 kilo...
^^
Line 2, column 574, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e solved and there –would be no danger. Because on higher location from Venus surface t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no reservoirs'?
Suggestion: there are no reservoirs
...us. The reading goes on to mention that there is no reservoirs of water and also no oxygen. So it make...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, for instance, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97337278107 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63125556144 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0305820592 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.05 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388827603392 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10920408738 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585303289891 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213822426368 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841818354655 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.