TPO 41
The passage claims that the United States must create stricter regulations for handling and storing coal cash in power plants, for coal cash has a harmful effect on environment. But the companies disagree with this plan and provide three reasons to support its approach. However, the lecturer finds all ideas which have been mentioned by reading dubious and presents some evidences to refute them all.
In the first place, the author argues that power companies have a good rule for handling and storing coal cash. They use liner in every new pond or landfill. There is not any leakage when they use this liner. On the contrary, the professor brings up the idea that this rule is not sufficient for preventing leakage into environment. For this liner has utilized only in new land or pond. There are a lot of old disposal place that do not have any liner. So they are significant harmful for groundwater and they produce containment.
Furthermore, the reading asserts that the number of consumers that use the recycled products from coal cash decrease, because they have concern about using them. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that the number of consumers should not decline. For they use similar dangerous recycled material such as Mercury. There is very strict procedure for handling and storing this material. But as the consumers know that they recycle in safe way, they do not have any afraid from using them.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that the cost of company will be increased by creating this rule. So the price of electricity also will be increased by the power plant companies and it is not suitable for general public. Conversely, the speaker underlines the fact that the company have well worth and the cost of power companies will increase about 15 billion dollars. This amount of budget will increase only 1 percent of bill of every house and it is not very much that the general people dislike it.
- TPO 45 3
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students ages 14 18 improve their teaching It is considering two plans 1 Choose a small group of excellent teachers these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for traditional training in how to tea 87
- TPO 40 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 39
- TPO 42 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage claims that the United State...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts some evidences to refute them all. In the first place, the author argues th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndwater and they produce containment. Furthermore, the reading asserts that th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not have any afraid from using them. Finally, the reading passage holds the v...
^^^^
Line 8, column 218, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nt companies and it is not suitable for general public. Conversely, the speaker underlines the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40369348024 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5987711239 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3157894737 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395057488591 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122136079194 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807043082879 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233141357656 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338777070383 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.