tpo 41
Since coal ash, which is burning coal in power companies, is harmful to the environment, so much regulate harsh rules for handling and sorting it. The reading explains that power plants think new regulations are not necessary and have negative concluded. But the lecturer for three reasons has the vice versa idea.
In the beginning, regulation at present exists, power companies say. liner-special material rule hinders the coal ash part from leaking into the soil or environments. If they want to use landfill or ponds as a recycle bin must obey from the liner rule in every new built pond or landfill. Conversely, the listening asserts that this rule is not enough because it is just for new ponds or landfills, therefore old landfills or ponds never fallow liner-special material regulation. Coal ash easily mixes to groundwater and drinking water. It is harmful to the environment.
second, although the author explains that power companies assert establishing new strict regulations may affect recycling coal ash into other products and says these products are just too dangerous and may stop buying the products. The lecture debates that before it harsh strict created for handling other materials such as mercury. At that time, there was some afraid like this, but the adaptation of this regulation for mercury was successful.
And finally, the new regulations increase just one percent extra cost to power plants, while they are a huge number of wealthy, millions of dollars. Then, though customers pay one percent more money, their environment will be clear with these new regulations.
To sum up, the power plants strongly offer that creat new rules has some drawbacks, in contrast, the lecturer thinks new rules are positive for the environment and defend his idea for some reason.
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- tpo-41 70
- TPO-23 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 27 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich is burning coal in power companies, is harmful to the environment, so much r...
^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... three reasons has the vice versa idea. In the beginning, regulation at present ...
^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Liner-special
...at present exists, power companies say. liner-special material rule hinders the coal ash part...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...r. It is harmful to the environment. second, although the author explains that powe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: I_AFRAID[9]
Message: The adjective afraid is used with 'to': 'afraid to like'.
Suggestion: afraid to like
...s mercury. At that time, there was some afraid like this, but the adaptation of this regula...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, while, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16438356164 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66834230678 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0281408157 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.533333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533600606511 0.272083759551 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163085284502 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100715811483 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276295899944 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109212632895 0.0443174109184 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.