The article states that new regulations are unnecessary for handling and storing coal ash and might have some negative consequences and provide three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that definitly there should be stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that there are already some regulations such as using liner-special material. The professor refutes this point by saying that the regulations are not really sufficient. She states that liner-speacial material is used only for new ponds. If companies have old ponds they do not use the liner-special material and, so it will cause that coal ash will leak into the soil. There absolutely need new regulations to prevent it.
Second, the article posits that coal ash is used in other products for recycling but creating strict rules might discourage the recycling because people may not want to buy the products. However, the professor regulations do not mean stopping to buy the products. According to the professor, it is about how people react this situation. If we take mercury as an example in the case people had a few concern about new regulations but it did not affect people’s attitude.
Third, the reading says that regulations would cause an important increase in disposal and handling costs for the power companies and they would reflect the increase to people. The professor opposes this point by explaining that it is true, there would be an increase but the result will worth it. We also learn that the cost of disposal and handling would be 15 billion dollar. when we think number of people who use electricity there would be just one percent increase in their bill and it is not significant compare to the good result.
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO 41 - integrated writing 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun concern seems to be countable; consider using: 'few concerns'.
Suggestion: few concerns
... as an example in the case people had a few concern about new regulations but it did not af...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...nd handling would be 15 billion dollar. when we think number of people who use elect...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, third, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10101010101 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74330409004 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.437106513 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507937946141 0.272083759551 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155553975128 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106388472991 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297486512027 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769100675155 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.