The reading passage contends that there are three arguments regarding to the United States government’s new and strict regulations for coal ash, which are not necessary and might actually have negative consequences. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the point in the reading passage that effective environmental regulations already exist are argued by power company representatives. This is attributed to the fact that liner special materials that have currently used are not sufficient to prevent coal ash components from leaking into the soil. Those are required to use only for new landfill and ponds; however, many companies have used it for old one. In order to prevent additional coal ash, power companies would need more the liner materials. Without additional materials, chemical from the ash would be leaked and ground water would be adulterated. Eventually, the drinking water is also polluted. As long as the regulations are not erected, people would face on significant damage from them. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecture casts doubt on the idea made by the reading passage that the recycling of coal ash into other products might be discouraged by creating strict rules for storing and handling coal ash. This is because even these regulations seems discourage the recycling, it would not work like that. For instance, in a case of mercury, these materials also have controlled by the government’s restrict regulations over fifty years. However, it works well and eventually people have lack of concern about the mercury. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is refuted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the idea made in the reading passage that a significant increase in disposal and handling costs for the power companies would result from the strict new regulations by the government. It is obvious that at glance view, these regulations make many power companies to take a significant cost, however, it results well wealth extra cost. Also, the disposal and handling costs are only one percent and it is not big deal from them. As a result, with such reasoning, the reading passage’s final point is contradicted.
- The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe 50
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by the society in the past than today 65
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for instance', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266821345708 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.14849187935 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0881670533643 0.0723426182421 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0672853828306 0.0435111971325 155% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0185614849188 0.0277247811725 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106728538283 0.128828473217 83% => OK
Participles: 0.046403712297 0.0370669169778 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94220092694 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0139211136891 0.0208969081088 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0997679814385 0.128158765124 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0185614849188 0.0158828679856 117% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0092807424594 0.0114777025283 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2334.0 1645.83664459 142% => OK
No of words: 369.0 271.125827815 136% => OK
Chars per words: 6.32520325203 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.352303523035 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29810298103 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224932249322 0.187439937562 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149051490515 0.113142543107 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94220092694 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50135501355 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.5027470902 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0529801325 146% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4210526316 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8348762961 49.3711431718 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.842105263 132.220823453 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.894736842105 0.878197800319 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 49.2313507346 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.79207920792 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.661404838774 0.549887131256 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0948674768712 0.142949733639 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0565417348338 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.48501751433 0.631733273073 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138990380942 0.139662658121 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242216340413 0.266732575781 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127077557691 0.103435571967 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.463777361429 0.414875509568 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0323789005644 0.0530846634433 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.493474989748 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598866090331 0.0528353158467 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.62251655629 221% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.2958057395 155% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.