According to the reading passage, the author claims that there are several solutions which help birds to distinguish the glass and avoid hitting them. However, the lecturer entirely challenges these solutions and refuses them one by one respectively.
First of all, the professor casts doubt the first solution which made by the author that replacement of regular glass with one-way glass which is transparent in only one direction will help birds to not fly through the glass, the lecturer believes that the surface of one-way glass acts like mirror so it will as bad as regular glass because the wouldn't distinguish the real sky and tree and reflection of sky and tree. Thus it wouldn't be a favorable solution.
Secondly, the author in the reading asserts that setting up the colorful line in the regular window which has several opening which will help birds to distinguish the window and avoid a collision. Nevertheless, the speaker rebuts the solution, he points out that these opening which is small holes acts like the regular window because birds tend to pass through from that holes, so they have to build this hole very small which will make the room so dark and dim.
Finally, the professor rejects the claim which made in the reading passage regarding creating an artificial magnetic field that works like a compass which will help birds to avoid from the strike, the speaker says that research shows that birds only use this ability when they are traveling long-distance so they don't use this ability in short-distance. Thus, creating an artificial magnetic field is kind of useless.
- TOEFL T P O 40 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it s better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a sense of humor 73
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Nowadays, children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phone, video games, for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children's development. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ill as bad as regular glass because the wouldnt distinguish the real sky and tree and r...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nd tree and reflection of sky and tree. Thus it wouldnt be a favorable solution. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...and reflection of sky and tree. Thus it wouldnt be a favorable solution. Secondly, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hey are traveling long-distance so they dont use this ability in short-distance. Thu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, in short, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02247191011 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50075666424 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498127340824 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 128.834923449 49.2860985944 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.625 110.228320801 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 7.06452816374 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385299255491 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156126631386 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805008060535 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229386351669 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579943559739 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.