The passage and lecture both discuss agnostids -- a group of marine animals that started to extinct many years ago.The reading claims that there are 3 different theories how agnostids may have lived. But the professor disagree with these theories.
First of all, the reading passage says that this kind of animals may have been free swimming predators that hunted smaller animals. The professor refutes this statement. The speaker says that agnostid's size of eyes is not typical for predators, their eyes were tiny; that is why agnostids could not be predators
Secondly, the text puts out that agnostids inhabit on the seafloor, and they survive by scavening dead animals. However, the speaker says that seafloor animals do not have abilities to move quickly, but agnostids moved fast; that is why they occupied a large area.
Last but not least, the reading points that agnostids were parasites, feeding off large organisms.The lecture denies this and talks that agnostids had a big population. It contradicts characteristic of parasites, because enormous population of parasites could hurt larger sea organisms.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 71
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 73
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 75
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... that started to extinct many years ago.The reading claims that there are 3 differe...
^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st of all, the reading passage says that this kind of animals may have been free ...
^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nhabit on the seafloor, and they survive by scavening dead animals. However, the ...
^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied a large area. Last but not least, the reading points that agnostids were p...
^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... parasites, feeding off large organisms.The lecture denies this and talks that agno...
^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because enormous population of parasites could hurt larger sea organisms.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 176.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38068181818 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63384716386 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630681818182 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8756805774 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41313441583 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151451918494 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103581369882 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241289596454 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309649813111 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.