The article is about how the Agnostid ate and lived, and provides three possible theories. However, the professor believes that these theories are not authentic and refutes each of the author's claims.
First, the reading claims that Agnostids were free-swimming predators like other primitive arthropods. This point is challenged by the professor. She argues that those arthropods has a large eyes that could track the prays, however, the agnostics were almost blind. She also mentions that in order to be a predator they must have an alternative sensory organ to track the preys, but they don't.
Second, the author posits that Agnostids might be seafloor dwellers as some of their primitive ancestors was. The professor rebuts this point by mentioning that seafloor dwellers can't move fast and go far distances, so they live in small geographic area. On the other hand, the fossil information shows that they inhabited in large distances, so they had the ability of moving fast, which is something unusual for seafloor dwellers.
Finally, the author states that Agnostids were parasites, as there lots of modern-day arthropods that lives like this. The professor casts doubt this one by saying that, parasites population shouldn't be large, because would kill the host organizations. The information from fossils indicates that Agnostid's population was too large to consider them as parasites.
In conclusion, the professor effectively refutes each of the author's claims and theories.
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 60
- How do movies and television influence people's behavior.? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- It Has Been Said, "not Everything That Is Learned Is Contained In Books." Compare And Contrast Knowledge Gained From Experience With Knowledge Gained From Books. In Your Opinion, Which Source Is More Important? Why? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- TPO49 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'eye'?
Suggestion: eye
...rgues that those arthropods has a large eyes that could track the prays, however, th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sory organ to track the preys, but they dont. Second, the author posits that Agno...
^^^^
Line 6, column 180, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt by mentioning that seafloor dwellers cant move fast and go far distances, so they...
^^^^
Line 8, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ne by saying that, parasites population shouldnt be large, because would kill the host o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so, then, well, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43347639485 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70544949689 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622317596567 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4187733998 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380613345035 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125102548393 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965037674265 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173641222739 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097304920145 0.0443174109184 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.