TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task
In the set of material, the passage and lecture discuss about discovered at a native american archaeological. Both believed that North American by European explores known as the Norse, almost a thousand years ago. However, the passage and lecture discord in some 3 points.
First of all, the passage say that archaeologists belive that the coins is not a genuine piece of historical evidence, but historical fake. In other hand, the lecture affirms that archaeologists don’t belive that the evidence is fake, but truth, and as the reading passage, the lecture have three reasons to support your opinion.
The first problem that author claims is have a distance of 1000 kilometers between the Main site and the Norse, suggesting the coin has no real connection with the settlements. Even though, the lecture says that not is great distance, but enough for a travel in a North American.
The second reason is that Norse did not bring any silves coins with them to their North American settlements, affirm the author. Rather than, according to the lecture, Norse had a great coins a Money. Moreve, the Norse created a permanent relation, suggesting that author’s reason is a complicad possible.
Thrid and last, the author purpose that the Norse Who traveled to North America ould have understood that silver coins would most likely be useless to them. Meanwhile in the lecture explain that the Norse probrably see North America more atractive and the coins is intresting and beaultiful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-02 | Nerilene | 80 | view |
| 2016-11-17 | EugeneDubinchuk | 91 | view |
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 68
- TPO 18 Independent Writing Task 22
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 76
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing TaskSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, the passage and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at archaeologists don't belive that the evidence is fake, but truth, and as ...
^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...The first problem that author claims is have a distance of 1000 kilometers between t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'travel'.
Suggestion: travel
...t not is great distance, but enough for a travel in a North American. The second rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'Money'.
Suggestion: Money
...to the lecture, Norse had a great coins a Money. Moreve, the Norse created a permanent ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...s would most likely be useless to them. Meanwhile in the lecture explain that the Norse p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lecture explain that the Norse probrably see North America more atractive and the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17551020408 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70992130317 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567346938776 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3698195924 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517511137594 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174619719579 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101695911406 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259947653641 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073707340875 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.