TPO 45
The reading and the lecturer are both about the discoveries of an old fossil from a kind of insect which is called Bee. The author of the reading feels that the 200-million-year-old fossilized trees in the state of Arizona are not convincing evidence for the fact. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. She says that it can be possible that those specific tracks are from bees.
To begin with, the writer argues that there are not any fossil from actual bees have been found from 200 million years ago. It is said that the earliest preserved body of bee remained from 100 million years ago which is half as old as the fossils discovered in the state of Arizona. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that it is true that there are no fossils remain from bees, but fossils from bees remain if they put in resin of trees. Additionally, she says that those especial trees were common much later, and maybe those trees did not have any resin to keep the fossils from bees.
Secondly, the reading states that the absence of a flowering plant is evidence that bees were not live 200 million years ago. In the article, it is said that today's bees have a strong relationship with flowering plants. The lecturer, however, rebuts on this by mentioning that bees may feed on nonflowering plants like pine trees. The lecturer elaborates on this by bringing up that they adapted themselves to these kinds of trees to have a stable condition in the environment.
Finally, the author posits that those bees have some shortage in their body organization. It is also said that the chamber in the modern bee nest is closed by caps that have a spiral pattern, but those fossilized chambers did not have this element. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that chemical tracks are true about this matter. She says that for chamber they have the same material as modern bees.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following paragraphs? Movies and television have a more negative effect than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- EXTRA 2 3
- Carved stone balls 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or the 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or the 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e not convincing evidence for the fact. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70359281437 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49014695735 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473053892216 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3924027983 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4117647059 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927330194472 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362245473506 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0140652749984 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06342205966 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00984281010789 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.