TPO 45-integrated
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the possibility of an old fossil structure whether were build by bees or not. The reading says that there are many doubts and this structure was not created by bees and provide three claims namely, lacking fossils of real bees, no presence of flowering plant, and the difference in some details. On the contrary, the professor asserts that the aforementioned points are not convincing and refuses all these claims and provides three compelling reasons.
Firstly, the author points out that there are not any fossils of actual bees which have been found at that date. The professor, in contrast, avers that it is true that there are no actual fossils but the reality is that the bees did not preserve in the fossils because the bees lived on special trees that had resin which is a sticky fluid. Moreover, those tresses were very rare and were common on that date. Therefore, the fact that there were not any fossils of actual bees does not mean the bee does not exist.
Secondly, the reading passage claims that the flowers on which the bees feed were not available in that period. The lecturer, on the contrary, casts doubt on this point by saying that the bees fed on non-flowering plants which preceded flowering plants such as Fine and Pine trees. Furthermore, by arriving of flowering plant the new bees may have adapted to them and feed on them.
Finally, the reading contends that there are some differences in the fossils such as lacking spiral pattern in the nest. The speaker, by contrast, refutes this claim by asserting that even though there are some differences in the nest, by chemical analyze it reveals that this nest belongs to bees because the bees excrete some waterproof components on the nest, and the analysis turns out that this structure was used by the bees.
- TPO 50 Integrated Writing Task 63
- PO 18 Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskA recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 73
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing TaskSome people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 70
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing TaskCarved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...lity of an old fossil structure whether were build by bees or not. The reading says ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80696202532 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35875428125 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487341772152 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2916011942 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751002757369 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326820698211 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0144879912956 0.0662205650399 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504460251687 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141749885856 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.