TPO- 45 Integrated task
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecture and the reading are about the existence of bees 200 million years ago. the reading states that, bees were not available during that time and provides three main reasons ti support this theory. The lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and refutes every of the reasons given on the text . She does not feel that bees were not present 200 million years ago
First of all, the lecturer argues the first reason that fossil remains of actual bees are not present because bees could not be preserved at that time. A sticky liquid is secreted by trees to preserve the bees, but such trees were not originated earlier, instead they become common much later. It might happened that the bees had exhausted in the absence of these sticky liquids.
Secondly, with regard to the second reason, absence of flowering plants, the lecturer explains that when flowering plants were not present, bees might be feeding on non flowering plants such as ferns and pine trees. They might have adapted feeding on flowering plants later. Therefore the lecture argues the claim that bees could not exist in absence on flowering plants.
Finally, the lecturer objects the third reason - structures lack some details, She points out that chemical evidences support that these structures are made by earlier bees. Earlier bees had special water proofing substance to preserve the nest, so they might not require structures like to preserve their nests. This is in direct contradiction with the claim in the reading passage that the fossilized nests are made by another kind of insects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Kumari Soni | 81 | view |
| 2019-03-25 | mared83 | 3 | view |
| 2018-10-03 | mrymbrsh96 | 3 | view |
| 2018-10-02 | ankitapatel | 90 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | kenneth7883 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children's development. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO - 48 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...xistence of bees 200 million years ago. the reading states that, bees were not avai...
^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s every of the reasons given on the text . She does not feel that bees were not pr...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...pted feeding on flowering plants later. Therefore the lecture argues the claim that bees...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring plants later. Therefore the lecture argues the claim that bees could not exi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, kind of, such as, first of all, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98120300752 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24130146988 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8304180017 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.070227138798 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274256662698 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200075557598 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0451241699658 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00996211060554 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.