The reading and the listening are both about the size of the animals in the past and today. Both of them contradict each other provide their own reasons and examples to support their points of view.
Firstly, The writer of the reading passage supports the fact that in the past are a larger in size than those of today. He mentions that the availability of the oxygen was greater than the current time. On the other hand, the tutor of the listening part contradicts this idea. He states that in the past the earth was full of volcanic poisonous gases. That decreases the oxygen content in the environment. Consequently, it is hard for the animals to breath.
Moreover, The teacher argues that the second reason is the plants contain enough nutrients that help that the animals to grow. The speaker drafts this claim. He states earth has a vast variety of the plant but contain ow nutrients. He elaborates his idea by mentioning that the fossils show scary results. they conclude that the creatures rely on the carbon dioxide.
Finally, The reading contends that the warm climate is another factor affect on the huge size of the animals. He claims that leads to decreasing the energy consumed to warm their body. The professor defutes this claims. He posits that the warm weather leads to smaller animal size. He explains that by saying the animals after eating need to cool down their body. consequently, they lose energy and hence their bodies become smaller.
Inclusion, the reading, and the listening are about the size of the animal in the past and the current time. Both contradict each other.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 73
- TPO-50 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 70
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 70
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...upports the fact that in the past are a larger in size than those of today. He mentions that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...g that the fossils show scary results. they conclude that the creatures rely on the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...that the warm climate is another factor affect on the huge size of the animals. He claims...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...er eating need to cool down their body. consequently, they lose energy and hence their bodie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, moreover, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83695652174 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35716462254 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2771947142 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.5714285714 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1428571429 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216876076402 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647782408711 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455601773206 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118466001356 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333990662062 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.3589403974 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.9 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.