TPO 45- Question 1
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on the age of a special kind of insects that has lived on the earth. The penman puts forward 3 main theories which are disapproved by the following orator.
To begin with, the author argues that the bees weren't living 200 million years ago because of recent researches and discoveries. this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. he claims that it is possible for the bees to be alive 200 million years ago. additionally, he says that the provided facts by the experts are unconvincing and doubtfull.
Secondly, the writer suggests that the absence of plants which flourish in some periods of time is another fact to cast doubt about life of bees. In the article, it is said that, duality of bee and flowering plant isn't out of sight. The lecturer, however rebuts this by mentioning that changes during the time can take place to any creature such as bees. he elaborates on this by bringing up the point that there are possibilities of other kinds of plants to be food for early beed.
Finally, the author posits that founded sturctures in Arizona hasn't some details to prove being for bees. Moreover, in the article it is stated that modern nests of bees has special pattern but the fossilized founded chambers doesn't have. In contrast, the lecturer position is that there are chemical evidence to proof that this structures were made by bees. he notes that chemical analyzes of modern and historical nest of bees help scientist to be sure about the theory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...n with, the author argues that the bees werent living 200 million years ago because of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e of recent researches and discoveries. this specific argument is challenged by the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...argument is challenged by the lecturer. he claims that it is possible for the bees...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...bees to be alive 200 million years ago. additionally, he says that the provided facts by the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...hat, duality of bee and flowering plant isnt out of sight. The lecturer, however reb...
^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ake place to any creature such as bees. he elaborates on this by bringing up the p...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...sits that founded sturctures in Arizona hasnt some details to prove being for bees. M...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ern but the fossilized founded chambers doesnt have. In contrast, the lecturer positio...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...that this structures were made by bees. he notes that chemical analyzes of modern ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50641967308 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587121212121 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5435888798 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.3571428571 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129721762409 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426824228741 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361071788446 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704879851462 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319310046953 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.