Tpo 46
The passage reading proposes some benefits that can be gained from replacing papers by electronic databases in sotageing medical records. The lecture, however, casts doubt on proposed statements and offer some counterclaims to refue them all.
First, the reading argues that elecronic databeses reduce the cost of storage due to both being space-saving and accessable without requiring paper material and printing. On the contrary, the professor is of the idea that doctors including those who have adapted electronic systems contue keeping paper records as well for they are needed in some legal protocols and also can be considered a good backup; therefore, most of the doctors would have to pay for both methods which makes the method not effective and economical.
Next, the passage mentions that electronic databases prevent harmful consequenses of medical errores that are causes by unstandared storage methods, vague handwritings, and other man-made errors. In contrast, the lecturer highlights the fact that since doctors would still use manual trend while examining pations and office crew are people who inter information in computers, and acordingly, they may still misinterpret the word even this method does not practicaly prevents errores.
Finally, the reading states that a reach database of medical records can be very helpful in research that is not feasible while using paper method. Conversely, the speaker dismisses the claim due to the fact that difficalt and coplicated procidure of accessing such data even if has been stored electronically, does not facilitize researches. In addition, she mentions that there are stict privacy regulations that are compatible with pationts’ requests and every access to data requires many permittions including that of pation’s so that researchers still have difficulty having rata.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62277580071 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86247559692 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8585497397 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.555555556 110.228320801 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2222222222 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2222222222 7.06452816374 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34748720433 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128484009522 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935304889539 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184839950593 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403265369271 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.3589403974 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 53.8541721854 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.0289183223 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.91 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.42419426049 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.