tpo 47
The reading claims that Pterosaurs was not capable of powered flight and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and provides several points to refute them all.
First, the author argues that Pterosaurs was a cold-blooded animal and he did not have high metabolism, therefor, this animal was not able to produce enough energy for powered-flight. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this ideas by stating the fact that this animal had a hair like cover which help him to keep his metabolism high. Eventually, Pterosaurs had a faster metabolism than what the reading says and he was probably able to fly.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the high weight of this animal would not allow him to fly. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that the intricate anatomy of this animal help him to have an unusual low weight. For instance, Pterosaurs had a hollow boons which helped him to keep his body weight low enough to allow him fly.
Finally, the reading asserts that the Pterosaurs did not have powerful legs, so, he was not able to jump high enough before his fly. On the contrary, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that this animal utilized his four legs for jumping. As a result, he did not have a problem to jump high enough. She also argues that other animals such as bats use the same method for their jump and although they are not able to run fast by utilizing their feet, they can jump high enough and after that they can fly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'boon'?
Suggestion: boon
.... For instance, Pterosaurs had a hollow boons which helped him to keep his body weigh...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'so', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.199324324324 0.261695866417 76% => OK
Verbs: 0.165540540541 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.097972972973 0.0723426182421 135% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0743243243243 0.0435111971325 171% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0675675675676 0.0277247811725 244% => OK
Prepositions: 0.097972972973 0.128828473217 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0101351351351 0.0370669169778 27% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.37047663815 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0405405405405 0.0208969081088 194% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.114864864865 0.128158765124 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0101351351351 0.0158828679856 64% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0101351351351 0.0114777025283 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1532.0 1645.83664459 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 271.125827815 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69516728625 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.301115241636 0.374372842146 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.204460966543 0.287516216867 71% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.130111524164 0.187439937562 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0817843866171 0.113142543107 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37047663815 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490706319703 0.539623497131 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.7089078355 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4166666667 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1214251512 49.3711431718 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 42.8627633209 50.5018328374 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.0 1.90840788429 52% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476015368539 0.549887131256 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14722764943 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0771188419966 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.6288449369 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.100097727581 0.139662658121 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226273019393 0.266732575781 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586596291873 0.103435571967 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350656008838 0.414875509568 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0582986937847 0.0530846634433 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331603849005 0.40443939384 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447817844385 0.0528353158467 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.