tpo 47
The reading passage provides three reasons to prove this theory that the pterosaurs were not able to flight. However, the professor rejects all of the reasons because of the evidences they are not true.
First, the passage declares that the pterosuars were the cold-blood animal like the modern reptiles. This type of animals have a slow metabolism and are not able to produce a lot of energy. And, for flighting animals need to have a lot of energy like the modern vertebrates that are warm-blood and able to produce a loft of energy. So, the pterosaurs were not flight. However, the professors completely disagree with this idea. In fact, according to fossil of the pterosaurs, their body had dense hair and its cover by the fair which is the characteristic of the warm-blood animal. So, the pterosaurs could produce enough energy for flying.
Second, the letter asserts that the pterosaurs were heavy which prevented if from flapping fast enough to fly for any length of time. But, the lecturer does not accept this claim. Actually, the evidences shows that its weigh was not so much because of its body's structure. Its bone are hollow instead of solid. So, pterosaurs were light in spite of their large size and they are able to flap their wing fast and fly.
Third, the reading explains that the birds need to run fast or jump in order to take off and start flying, but the pterosaurs could not take off. In fact, the pterosaurs for taking off need a large powerful muscles in its back legs, but its fossils reveal that it had too small and weak leg. Nevertheless, the woman's rejects this reason because in spite of the birds that walk on two foot, the pterosaurs walked on their four foot which enable them to run fast enough and jump high to take off and launch themselves into the air.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-05 | mojtaba_aam | 73 | view |
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities 70
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 83
- tpo 33When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 65
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 65
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... flight. However, the professor rejects all of the reasons because of the evidences they a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'flighted'.
Suggestion: flighted
... of energy. So, the pterosaurs were not flight. However, the professors completely dis...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'muscle'?
Suggestion: muscle
...rs for taking off need a large powerful muscles in its back legs, but its fossils revea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67507886435 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36171654151 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498422712934 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3434570507 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1764705882 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477340630377 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146705200254 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108804520357 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259529181047 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735007801882 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.