TPO 47-
The reading claims that pterpsaurs were very large animals with a wingspan over 12 meters that could not flight and presents three reasons to support its approach. However, the lecturer finds all ideas which have been mentioned by the reading dubious and provides some evidences to refute them all.
At the first place, the author argues that these animals were cold-blooded like modern reptiles. As cold-blooded animals usually have a slow metabolism, they cannot generate enough energy to fly. In contrast, the professor brings up the idea that their fossils indicate that they have hair and fur covering on their skin. It is a common feature of warm-blooded animals that need high body temperature. The warm-blooded animals have a fast digestion system to supply enough power for flying.
Furthermore, the reading asserts that they were very heavy and massive because of their large body. So they could not able to flop their wing to stay stable on the sky. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that they had a different anatomy. Although they were large sized animal, according to evidences, their bones were hollow. This characteristic reduce their weight. So their weight was light despite their large size and they could flop their wing to glide.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that animals must run very fast to help them to jump and take off. According to records, they had very small and weak muscles in their back legs that present they could not run fast to take off. Conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that they are different from birds. The birds run on two legs and must enough fast to fly based on their two limes. But the pterosaurs could run on four limes. So they could run fast enough to push of the ground by increasing their speed with four limes.
- TPO 45 3
- TPO 40 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 73
- TPO 48-Integrated 71
- TPO 42 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enough power for flying. Furthermore, the reading asserts that they were very ...
^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the reading passage holds the view that animals must run very fast to help them ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87179487179 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34884950925 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7546696196 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414422170073 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122151952928 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516561588174 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223347121372 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043083003491 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.