TPO 47 integrated task
The lecture and the reading are about Pterosaurs powered flight. The reading states that several arguments against powered flight of pterosaurs. However, the lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and refutes all the arguments presented in the reading. He does not feel that pterosaurs are really capable of powered flight as the author assumes.
First of all, the lecture argues that the Pterosaurs have metabolism process inside their body. Also, they have dense hair like covering which keeps them warm from inside. This shows that they are warm blooded animals, and they need to maintain high temperature inside the body. This will supply them energy to fly. The reading passage contradicts this
Secondly, with regard to second argument, Pterosaurs have anatomical features that make it light in weight. Their bones are hollow, thus have low weight despite of the large body frame. Therefore it is easy for them to fly in air by flapping their wings.The reading passage gives the opposite view.
Finally, the lecturer objects the third argument that Pterosaurs are not able to take off from the ground like birds do. He points out that birds use their lower limbs to walk on ground, while the Pterosaurs uses all four limbs to push off the ground .So they are fast enough to run and jump high enough into the sky. Moreover, they can fly far up in the sky with four limbs not only by the back ones. This is in direct contradiction with the passage claim that Pterosaurs does not have much strong limbs to fly up in the sky.
- TPO 47 integrated task 71
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get 78
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO - 48 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: light
...s have anatomical features that make it light in weight. Their bones are hollow, thus have low ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...weight despite of the large body frame. Therefore it is easy for them to fly in air by fl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...m to fly in air by flapping their wings.The reading passage gives the opposite view...
^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es all four limbs to push off the ground .So they are fast enough to run and jump...
^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s all four limbs to push off the ground .So they are fast enough to run and jump ...
^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...all four limbs to push off the ground .So they are fast enough to run and jump hi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, while, first of all, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8127340824 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25657839513 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0287575931 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346058450389 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113948785973 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538454720341 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192056973153 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285259833772 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.