TPO-48
The reading passage and the lecture are both about several ways to prevent frogs decline. While the passage states that there are several ways to prevent frogs population reduction the lecture contradicts these claims and provides evidence to contrary.
The author argues that these frogs harm with the pesticide that use for crops. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that ending the use of these pesticides aren't economically and fair because in this way the crops quantity will be reduce.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that fungus spreading around the world are the cause to this reduction. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that these fungus apply to individual and didn't passing through offspring.
Finally, the reading states that destruction of natural habitats specially water sources is a reason for decline the number of these frogs. In contrast, the speaker mentions that global warming which is the real threat for disappearing water and ruin the nature is the cause to reduce the frogs population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...that ending the use of these pesticides arent economically and fair because in this w...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crops'' or 'crop's'?
Suggestion: crops'; crop's
...ically and fair because in this way the crops quantity will be reduce. Furthermore, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fungus' or 'these fungi', 'these funguses'?
Suggestion: this fungus; these fungi; these funguses
... the professor underlines the fact that these fungus apply to individual and didnt passing t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...at these fungus apply to individual and didnt passing through offspring. Finally, th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...n the nature is the cause to reduce the frogs population.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 1373.03311258 65% => OK
No of words: 169.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27218934911 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52497070263 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0663374896 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313985062769 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133210876841 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741493887108 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167758943213 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582211652592 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.