TPO- 48 Integrated writing task
Reading and lecture discusses about techniques to save number of depleting frogs. Reading explained three methods to save population of frogs, but professor is not convinced by these methods.
First and foremost, reading states that farmers use pesticides to protect growth of crops cause detrimental effects on frog’s wellbeing. Lecture cast doubt on this statement; she thinks that diminishing use of pesticides is not beneficial option for farmers. As farmers need to harvest large number of crops to compete with other farmers, as a consequence farmers may not earn enough income.
Second, reading mention that widespread fungus growth leads to severe infection in frogs and contribute to depletion of frog habitat; and proposed that antifungal medications and heating treatment may aid in destructing harmful fungus. On the other hand, lecture refutes this method; she suggests that this treatment is very complex and economically not feasible. As this method requires capturing of each frog and treating them individually because infection is most likely inherit to young ones.
Finally, reading implies that human activity such as utilizing water and transforming wet-lands for development can cause catastrophic effects to habit of frog. While lecture believes that global warming seems to be predominant fact in plummeting number of frogs. Furthermore, she points out that harmful consequences of global warming endangered many other habitats and even extinction of some species. As a consequence, lecture successfully casts doubt on points made in reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-07 | Taniazehra | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... catastrophic effects to habit of frog. While lecture believes that global warming se...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67932489451 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88003661546 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628691983122 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4379787345 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271502137945 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877299943737 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840698332963 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144932247045 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675760258088 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.