The article and the lecture are about the declination of frogs and the methods suggested to stop this declination. The article suggests three ways to stop the frogs declination, however the lecture casts doubt on all these methods.
To begin with, the reading thinks that one of the reason that affect the frogs populations is to restrict or reduce the pesticides since it kills frogs. The lecturer refute this claim. He believes that it is not practical solution and could have disastrous effects on the farmers. Moreover, it would lead that the farmers lose their competitive abilities in areas where this restriction of pesticides is applied.
Secondly, The reading states that eradicating of fungus is one possible solution since these fungus cause dehydration of frogs' skin and finally the death of the frogs. The lecturer rebuts this claim as well. He believes that it is expensive and not feasible procedure. He said that using this technique requires applying it to every individual frog, which is impractical,even though, that would not prevent frogs to transfer this fungus to its offspring.
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specifi 60
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 76
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested stopping'.
Suggestion: suggested stopping
...he declination of frogs and the methods suggested to stop this declination. The article suggests ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...article suggests three ways to stop the frogs declination, however the lecture casts ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...ides since it kills frogs. The lecturer refute this claim. He believes that it is not ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fungus' or 'these fungi', 'these funguses'?
Suggestion: this fungus; these fungi; these funguses
...f fungus is one possible solution since these fungus cause dehydration of frogs skin and fin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , even
...ry individual frog, which is impractical,even though, that would not prevent frogs to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 179.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20111731844 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73220342422 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 50.1278365781 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270537207047 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946331276783 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811333425246 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178280273992 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032805619456 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.