The reading and the lecture are both about the causes of the decreasing in the number of the frogs in their habitats. Each provides three reasons to support that. The author and the speaker cast doubt on each other.
Frist of all the author claims that one of the reasonable causes that's frogs number decreases is the use of the pesticides. These chemicals not only kill the insects in the frog habitats but also affect on the central nervous systems of the these frogs
On the other hand, the speaker of the listening contradicts this idea. He states that it is seriously unfair to rely on the pesticides as a reason for that. He elaborates on his idea by saying that, the farmers will be economically affected. in addition to that, the farmers will be unable to compete with others in different areas. The crops will decrease and lower the yield.
Secondly, The fungus infection which attacks the frogs leads to thickening of their skin and hence, will kill the frog because of the dehydration. He states that the use of thermal heat to kill the fungus will affect the frogs as well. On the hand, The Professor refutes this point. He argues that The use of the antifungal is a complicated and difficult way to use. He also explains that the use of antifungal should be applied on large scale and must be used again and again. Nevertheless, this method is not guaranteed that will be inherited to next offsprings.
Lastly, The tutor in reading claims that The frogs lay their eggs on wetland habitat, and because of the people developing the frogs, natural habitat decreased. The Teacher defeats this argument. He states the reason for that is the global warming. Moreover, he suggests that the decrease in the wetland and marshes will be unlikely, but the global warming will increase the wetlands and causes death even extinction of these species.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 73
- TPO-53 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 70
- TPO-50 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...laims that one of the reasonable causes thats frogs number decreases is the use of th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he pesticides. These chemicals not only kill the insects in the frog habitats bu...
^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...e insects in the frog habitats but also affect on the central nervous systems of the thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... farmers will be economically affected. in addition to that, the farmers will be u...
^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gues that The use of the antifungal is a complicated and difficult way to use. He...
^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t be used again and again. Nevertheless, this method is not guaranteed that will ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79813664596 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4650111258 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490683229814 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6382373944 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3157894737 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274975447609 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845195162204 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914268130222 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16584106225 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898000345184 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.