TPO 49 - Integrated writing

The reading passage illustrates that humpback whales take benefits of stars to navigate while they migrate for a long distance and provides some specific reasons. While, the lecturer refutes the claim and explains that the idea is fascinating but not convincing at all and supports his own reasons.
First, the author asserts that whales are intelligent enough to keep track of the stars to migrate. However, the professor posits that it does not seem to be any connection between intelligence and navigation. He puts this idea forward by adding that some birds such as ducks also migrate, however, they have just average cognition ability. This means that navigation ability is intrinsic.
Second, the writer holds the opinion that the whales migrate in a straight line because they are using starts as animals rely on landmarks. Conversely, the speaker states that there are not any external forces needed for the marine giant animals to navigate. Since they have bio-magnate in their brain, they migrate using earth magnetic direction rather than stars.
Third, although the author claims that the behavior termed "spy-hopping" functions as star spying, however, the professor believes that it does not have anything to do with stars. Additionally, he explains that sharks do the same behavior for hunting. Furthermore, whales do the behavior during day time. Consequently, the claim is just a pure speculation and spy-hopping is not relevant to starts and navigation.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3547008547 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88746298194 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8748561138 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3846153846 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383487680963 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115080191034 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823991009133 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205274249227 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548350571233 0.0443174109184 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.