TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task
In the reading passage, the author argues that humpback whales migrate long distances by stars because of their high intelligence, straight lines routines, and spy-hopping ability. However, the following listening material entirely challenged the statement made by the writer.
As opposed to the reading's idea that humpback whales are highly intelligent to use stars to navigate, the professor indicates that there is no real connection between high intelligence and navigating by stars. In detail, the professor advances the theory by saying that there are other animals using stars to navigate who are not clever, like ducks.
The professor continues to discredit the writing's assertion that humpback whales migrate in straight lines to maintain direction, by examining the fact that they also use external objects. To be more specific, they can use magnitude things to help them stay on track during navigate.
Finally, the passage infers that humpback whales use spy-shopping to look at stars as they migrate, whereas the lecture rebuts this theory by notifying that other animals also exhibit spy-hopping. Specifically, sharks use spy-hopping just for hunting instead of navigating or looking stars.
In the reading, the article introduces methods used by humpback whales to navigate. However, in the listening, the professor gives out three reasons why these beliefs can't stand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the reading passage, the author argue...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed the statement made by the writer. As opposed to the readings idea that hum...
^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...e by the writer. As opposed to the readings idea that humpback whales are highly in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate who are not clever, like ducks. The professor continues to discredit the...
^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writings'' or 'writing's'?
Suggestion: writings'; writing's
...he professor continues to discredit the writings assertion that humpback whales migrate ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them stay on track during navigate. Finally, the passage infers that humpbac...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tead of navigating or looking stars. In the reading, the article introduces m...
^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ves out three reasons why these beliefs cant stand.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59905660377 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73943730206 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4075407349 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.7 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397251312431 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143980593696 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825087569585 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204554592158 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648809720599 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.