Having revised both of the sources, the subject of both the passege and the lecture is Humback whales which should migrate for food and moting purpose. The issue is how they find their direction when they migrate. Unlike listenig passege, the autors states that Humback whales used stars for navigating.
Firstly, Unlike the listening passage, the reading passege says that humback whole, whose brains have a high level, is intelligent to use stars. the listening passage, on the other hand, says that also the other animals can benefit from stars for searching their way so it doesnt mean that humback whole are enough intelligent.
Secondly, the lecturer says that humback whole emmigrate in the straight lines. For instance, many birds and the other terreatrial creaturs use physical landmarks for migrating. The proffesor reject this idea. He says that they use generally earth magnatic fielt.
Thirdly, the reading passage argues that humback whole has a special behavier whis is observed floating straight up for minutes at a time. This behavier awere of spy-hopping which is seemed so less animals.The speaker , however, disagrees with this point of view.
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 70
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 76
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 80
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...igh level, is intelligent to use stars. the listening passage, on the other hand, s...
^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rom stars for searching their way so it doesnt mean that humback whole are enough inte...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun animals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...awere of spy-hopping which is seemed so less animals.The speaker , however, disagree...
^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...hopping which is seemed so less animals.The speaker , however, disagrees with this ...
^^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ch is seemed so less animals.The speaker , however, disagrees with this point of v...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 30.3222958057 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26344086022 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41682833976 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639784946237 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8479524948 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29009890247 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105126589836 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502321865802 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170503659951 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558392531546 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.