TPO 49: Summarize the points made in the lecture about humpback whales, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage
The article and lecture are both about how humpback whales are able to use the stars as a navigator when they migrate. The author thinks that this theory is plausible. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. He believes that there is no evidence that this theory is correct.
First of all, The author claims that Humpback whales have a developed brain and they are smart animals. The professor, on the other hand, argues that there is no significant link between intelligence and using the stars to navigate. He elaborates on this by providing an example of some birds like ducks. Ducks are one of the birds who use the stars in their migration. However, ducks are average smart birds. as a result, there is no direct link between star navigation and cleverness.
Secondly, the writer claims that Humpback whales use straight lines when they are migrating. Such kind of behavior is used by animals depending on stars during their migration. The lecturer challenges this argument by asserting that the whales have a chemical material in their brain called biomagnetite. This material makes whales able to sense the Earth's magnetic field. Moreover, the existence of this material makes scientists think these whales depend on the Earth's magnetic field when migrating rather than the stars.
Finally, it is mentioned in the article that Humpback whales use unusual behavior called spy-hopping, in which they raise their head above water to see the stars. The speaker, however, rebuts this by stating that this behavior is also used by sharks although they do not migrate. Normally sharks use this technique to catch their prey. In addition, whales act this way also during day hours when there are no stars in the sky.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
- TPO 47: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 71
- TPO45:Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO48: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 73
- tpo 46: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Playing computer games is a waste of time. children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r thinks that this theory is plausible. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...However, ducks are average smart birds. as a result, there is no direct link betwe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00689655172 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46756847394 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496551724138 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2056676712 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4210526316 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2631578947 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337959694704 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105409022536 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821631480911 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212288032655 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358515782819 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.