Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Our planet plays a vital role in our existence. Without the earth, there is no humanity. Some people think that human activities are harming our planet; others believe that humans are improving the Earth. In my opinion, we are affecting negatively on our Earth. I hold this opinion for two main reasons that I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, humans are polluting the environment every day. With the increased demands of human beings and their seek for more money. Humans build many factories and plants that are emitting daily a considerable amount of carbon dioxide and smoke to our air. These gases raise the effect of global warming by increasing the temperature on the surface of the earth. This effect may lead to the depletion of water, desertification, and death to a myriad of plants and animals. In addition, These manufacturers discharge the chemical wastes of their factories in the seas and oceans where it affects marine life. In other words, these hazardous chemicals are like toxins threatening our fish and corals lives. This effect is not restricted to marine animals, but it is also affecting us. When we consume these polluted fish, we eat a significant amount of these chemicals such as mercury, that affect our health negatively. Nowadays, we can see an increase in the rate of cancer disease as a result of consuming this type of food. Besides, mercury may lead to miscarriages and many other thyroid issues. As you can see, humans are harming the earth's environment.
Secondly, humans are depleting the natural resources of the earth. With the significant tend to urbanization, humans cut more trees every day to build new houses and facilities. With every tree we lose, we face a problem in decreasing the amount of oxygen available to us. Not only will trees provide us with oxygen through photosynthesis, but also decrease the amount of carbon dioxide which is responsible for the greenhouse effect. Trees are also salient because they provide shelters for many animals in the forests. By uprooting trees, we are depriving those animals of their homes to increase our homes. Trees are also crucial for keeping the soil from flooding and diverting. This clearly demonstrates that, humans cause a myriad of issues to our Earth.
To wrap things up, human beings are damaging our precious planet in every possible way. Not only are we contaminating the environment, but also we are depleting the natural resources to expand more. Humans have to be responsible for their deeds.
- tpo 46: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 73
- TPO48: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Playing computer games is a waste of time. children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers? 60
- TPO 47: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 71
- TPO 49: Summarize the points made in the lecture about humpback whales, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
... As you can see, humans are harming the earths environment. Secondly, humans are de...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00950118765 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69765556274 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524940617577 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0759034815 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3214285714 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0357142857 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184206148542 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613888365117 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824491706933 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135978258372 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706228377533 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.