Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Earth is the place where we all live, so this is the most important thing in our live. Everyone’s goal is to preserve our home from damaging and exist in ecosystem as a whole thing. Some people believe that the Earth is really being harmed by people, while others disagree. In my view, I think that human activity is making inestimable damage to the environment for two important reasons.
First, over the several decades with appearing of cars, farms air pollution have increased substantially. As a result, people not only harm to environment by boosting carbon dioxide which cause to global warming, ocean acidification, but also to yourself (people) such as: birth defects, cancer etc. For example, several days ago, I was in the lecture at the University about the environment protection. The professor provided us statistics of air pollution which horrified me. It goes without saying that millions of people die, thousand (thousands) of fishes by the lack of protein from corals, and animals too which all the consequences of pollution. This experience taught me to change my daily car on transport system using sustainable energy.
Second, killing other species is not good. Nowadays, there are a lot of zoos and specials areas which trying to save these endangered animals from extinction. Based on Darwin’s theory, beforehand people started to live in the Earth that was rational ecological system, where every specie was happy. To be specific, when I was kid, my dad took me to the hunting. He always said that I should show my dominance over other animals and be like predator in this world. Afterward, when I went to a school, I realized that he was not right and I should have to do this (these) things because I was harming to the environment as a matter of relaxing to rob one’s life which is a unjust. As a result, this impressed me a lot that I took part in a small school community which appeal others not to hunt and do fishing.
In sum, it is hard to reject that we harm to the Earth. Not only does it demolish the next generation, but it also shortens the planet’s life span by hunting, contaminating and so on. So, we all should protect our home and try not damage other species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'thousand thousand'.
Suggestion: thousand thousand
...out saying that millions of people die, thousand thousands of fishes by the lack of protein from cora...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...out saying that millions of people die, thousand thousands of fishes by the lack of prot...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...elaxing to rob one's life which is a unjust. As a result, this impressed me ...
^
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...elaxing to rob one's life which is a unjust. As a result, this impressed me a lot t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, while, for example, i think, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78701298701 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75495413857 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9170809595 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.15 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175646917321 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542204971065 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660535377733 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117143178592 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914613736504 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.