TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the lecture state the feasibility of establishing colonies of human to live and work on asteroids- rocky and icy objects existing in our solar system- instead of Moon and Mars. The passage points out to three reasons approving the fact that it is the best option. In contrast, the speaker refutes all the notions mentioning the ideas elaborated upon hereunder.
Firstly, the text suggests that low gravity is the result of the smaller size of the asteroids which leads to a safer landing on their surface compared to the Moon and Mars. Moreover, more tools and equipment could be carried to set up the colony. Also, it would be easier to take off again, which means less fuel is required for returning to Earth. On the contrary, the professor claims that low gravity presents certain risks. It causes severe health problem for astronauts since they will lose their muscle mass and bone density.
Secondly, the passage states that while there may be valuable elements in the asteroids, like gold and platinum, it is remarkably profitable for the sponsors to mine these raw materials and send them back to the Earth. The lecturer stands on the other side, indicating that there are additional factors to be considered. High costs of transporting these minerals to the Earth will reduce the profit by increasing the final price. Moreover, the extra supply of precious elements in the market will result in a significant drop in market price, which means less profit.
Finally, the reading asserts that as some asteroids come closer to Earth's orbit than our Moon in specific intervals, they are easy to reach and would be more affordable to fetch to than a planet like Mars. The listening refuses the notion, mentions that the paths in which asteroid orbit around the Earth can be unusual. They can come close to Earth and then move further than Mars. Thus, traveling a distance further than Mars for the trip back to Earth would be irrational and unreasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | cccmmm | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | NIMA SAEEDI | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | NIMA SAEEDI | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Aydin94 | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | phywhy | 3 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 29
- Downtown Zurzi is becoming increasingly congested with traffic, increasing the commuting time for those who work downtown or near downtown. The nearby city of Loft was faced with the same problem several years ago and implemented a small weekly tax for dr 63
- OG2 - professors appearance in TV programs and its outcomes. 80
- TPO 49 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reaso 73
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90504451039 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46622350219 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6012079679 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3125 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0825149612346 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262154695499 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242161468605 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046809043392 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191876444976 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.