TPO-53
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that high taxing on the cigarette and unhealthy foods can provide several benefits for all society members. While in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that each of these arguments explained in the text can be challenging.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that high taxes can discourage people from unhealthy behaviors. However, the professor claims that this plan may lead to some people to replace their expensive cigarettes with cheaper and lower quality ones that contain a much more harmful substance for human health. Also, about unhealthy foods, maybe some people still continue to buy these type of foods even under its more cost. In this way, they would have lower money to spend on health foods.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that high taxing would be financially fair. She says that this plan would be unfair if we count people income. This plan would be affected people with smaller income much more than people with larger income.
Finally, in the text, it is stated that the extra income that governments will get from the higher rate of taxation, will spend on improving social services. The professor subscribes that governments could earn millions of dollars from this kind of taxes. Thus, they become dependent on it and would not want to lose it. For example, they stop policies such as banning smoking in public places such as a park or even private ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | Mamalhastam | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | nasim | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | javadsafari | 3 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | VardanMelkonyan | 3 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Asgharik | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92277992278 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33658690137 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8999936451 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0769230769 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.