TPO-53: taxes on cigarettes
In the reading, the author claims that there are some viable hypotheses about being benefit high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products by pointing 3 reasons for support. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiates the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that taxes cause a negative sense to buy cigarettes. It is most likely the taxes diminish the death rate, which depends on cigarettes. Conversely, the lecturer holds the view that the high taxes do not aid to drop the cigarette smoking. According to her, if the people find out a high price for the cigarettes, they continue to buy even more due to they want to get more experience.
In addition, the reading passage brings up that the idea that the high taxes are fair for people who smoke cigarettes because the persons become a sickness in the future and as a result, the governments have to spend high money for healing them. It should be noted that it must be a difference between the healthy person and person who smoke the cigarettes. On the other hands, the lecturer disputes the point by clarifying this fact that the high taxes are not fair. According to the lecturer, although the high taxes are paid by a small population of the society (wealthy people), the large group or ordinary people do not have sufficient incomes for the high taxes.
Finally, the author asserts that governments benefit from the high taxes as the last point for supporting the issue. The taxes are spent on building stadiums and a lot of things which are useful for the people. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by point out that the taxes give more money for the governments which dislike prohibiting the cigarettes smoking in social places or parks.
- TPO-53: taxes on cigarettes 85
- TPO 51- strange behaviors of elephants 78
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sufficient incomes for the high taxes. Finally, the author asserts that governm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90228013029 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53693027816 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521172638436 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2507013163 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.769230769 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185280760539 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805921260465 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542004065936 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126499854306 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250729677972 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.