tpo 61 integrated task
The reading and the lecture are both about the defending of golden frogs from fungal infection. Whereas the author of the passage lists out three suggestions that can keep the frogs safe, the lecturer believes that they are not effective and refutes each of the reasons as illustrated below.
First, according to the reading, the concerned conservationist can use a special type of bacterium that produces a chemical against the fungus on the frog's skin. However, the professor disputes this idea. She mentions that this bacterium is just effective at the early age of frogs. In other words, these beneficial species don't last long enough to protect the frogs during adult age like breeding time. At the adult age, frogs will be vulnerable to fungus again.
Second, the author of the reading argues that by breeding the frogs in captivity then releasing them into the natural habitat, it is possible to preserve their population. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this argument. She states that these new frogs that originated from captivity are not able to continue living healthy in the natural habitat since other wild animals living in the same area have the same fungus. Therefore, they can transmit the illness easily to new frogs.
Finally, the passage states that there is a natural defensive mechanism that frogs can utilize to survive by increasing their body temperature to prevent fungal progress. On the contrary, the lecturer rejects this statement by remarking that this mentioned defending mechanism has some serious drawbacks for frogs. She explains that to raise the body temperature, a frog needs to consume lots of energy that results in a weaker frog. She posits that these weak and ill frogs can't survive to keep the population safe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-11 | Ali Talaei | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 78
- tpo 63 integrated 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Advertising influences people s behavior in a negative way 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n other words, these beneficial species dont last long enough to protect the frogs d...
^^^^
Line 4, column 475, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...he posits that these weak and ill frogs cant survive to keep the population safe.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, whereas, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12152777778 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55391091025 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0128189328 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455479269661 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137337979212 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850905215898 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251884058496 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352774237051 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.