tpo 8
The reading and the lecture are both about the memoirs of the Chevalier de Seingalt. Whereas the author of the reading states that his memoir is an inaccurate document, the lecturer suggests that the memoir is a reliable record. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three arguments.
First of all, according to the reading, the Chevalier claims that he was wealthy while living in Switzerland, but since the Chevalier is known to have borrowed money there, he cannot have been very rich. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She suggests that the Chevalier’s wealth was in the form of property that had to be sold in order to generate cash. So he wasn’t poor. Furthermore, she mentions that the Chevalier just had to borrow money for a few days while he waited for his property to be sold. Secondly, the reading states that the conversations recorded in the memoir may not be very accurate. These conversations occurred many years before the memoir was written, so it would have been impossible for the Chevalier to remember them accurately. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that Chevalier often recorded conversations in his journals each night after the conversations took place. The Chevalier wrote down everything he could remember from them. In addition, she points out that there were witnesses confirming that the Chevalier regularly consulted these notes when writing his memoir years later.
Finally, the reading claims that the Chevalier's depiction of his own escape from a famous prison in Venice cannot possibly be honest since the Chevalier could have asked politically well-connected friends to offer his jailers a bribe to free him. On the other hand, the lecture believes that other prisoners who had even more powerful political connections were never able to bribe their way to freedom, so the Chevalier probably couldn't either. Moreover, she points out that prison records indicate that soon after the Chevalier's escape, the ceiling of his room in the prison had to be repaired
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the memoirs of the Chevalier de Seingalt, the two/three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing TaskCar manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is th 71
- TPO13: The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 63
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their empl 76
- Tpo 40- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 66
- tpo 8 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... First of all, according to the reading, the Chevalier claims that he was wealthy...
^^
Line 9, column 431, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...y to freedom, so the Chevalier probably couldnt either. Moreover, she points out that p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 371.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18867924528 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75637540344 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504043126685 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0411226488 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.235294118 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.