tpo integrated 16
The lecture and the reading discuss the studying of the old culture and artifact in the kingdom. While the reading states that the science of archeology faced many serious problem and limitations, the reading enumerates three reasons of support, the lecture disagrees. It claims that after 1990 there was new guide lines and rules have been initiated.
First of all the reading states that, valuable artifact lost during constructions. While digging new foundation for the new building the builder uncovered the valuable sites and proceed with the construction, they did not preserve the artifacts. The lecture disagrees. it claims that the new regulations and rules forced the builder and the archeological to examine the are a of interest before they proceed any constructions. According to the professor the builders and the government should preserve any artifact according to the new rules.
Second, the reading says that due to the lack of the financial support from the government, many archeologist are focusing only on specific sites and left behind other important sites. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that al the expenses were paid by the construction companies not by the government. The companies support the financially by initial exam the area, then study far grater.
Third, the reading passage argues that, it was difficult to have a career job in archeology. Archeology job only found at universities or with a few government agencies. But, the lecture disagrees. It claims that a lot of paid work was found in the archeological filed for example, invest the site, doing research, drop off the plan, and processing the data. Furthermore, the number of job has been increased in Britain since 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e the artifacts. The lecture disagrees. it claims that the new regulations and rul...
^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...uilder and the archeological to examine the are a of interest before they proceed any ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd the archeological to examine the are a of interest before they proceed any co...
^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to examine the are a of interest before they proceed any constructions. Accordin...
^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun archeologist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many archeologists'.
Suggestion: many archeologists
... financial support from the government, many archeologist are focusing only on specific sites and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and left behind other important sites. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that a...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ork was found in the archeological filed for example, invest the site, doing rese...
^^^
Line 12, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earch, drop off the plan, and processing the data. Furthermore, the number of job...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, third, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28776978417 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84915702822 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7865339418 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4705882353 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250172275935 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706016462303 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537302555361 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142688818408 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215730387473 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.