TPO INTEGRATED 41
There has been many debates among whether the new regulations for handling and storing coal ash are necessary or not. The lecture says that the new regulations are necessary. However, the reading refutes saying that there is no need for new regulation as they will cause negative effects.
The first point of dispute is if the regulation exist or not. The lecture claims that the regulations that exist now are only applied for the new land fills. The linear not required to be applied for the old land fills and that contaminant the drink water. On the other hand, the reading contradicts this point by saying that companies that dispose coal ash should use linear in every new landfill build. So regulation exist are only are only applied for new landfill.
another controversial issue is the concerns about recycling coal ash. The lecturer says other materials like mercury has been stirage and handling for about 50 years and there are very few concern about it. but the reading oppose stating that consumer may consern that recycle coal as product are just too dangerous, nd may stop buying the products
The final issue of dispute is the increase in the cost. The professor says that the result of the handling and storage will worth it. If the cost will increase for the poer companeies for about 15 billion dollars, that would not too much after doing the math. Each house hold will pay 1 % that is not too much for having cleaner environment. Yet, the reading disagrees. It claims that the increase in the cost will force the power compaines to increase the bill of electricty, which would not be welcomed by the general public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as they will cause negative effects. The first point of dispute is if the reg...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'are only'.
Suggestion: are only
...new landfill build. So regulation exist are only are only applied for new landfill. another...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly are only applied for new landfill. another controversial issue is the conce...
^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun concern seems to be countable; consider using: 'few concerns'.
Suggestion: few concerns
...g for about 50 years and there are very few concern about it. but the reading oppose stati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...concern about it. but the reading oppose stating that consumer may consern that r...
^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... coal as product are just too dangerous, nd may stop buying the products ...
^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gerous, nd may stop buying the products The final issue of dispute is the increa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase in the cost. The professor says that the result of the handling and storage w...
^^
Line 10, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the math. Each house hold will pay 1 % that is not too much for having cleaner ...
^^
Line 10, column 515, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...cty, which would not be welcomed by the general public.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78350515464 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38647856327 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8149072092 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 7.06452816374 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466209412896 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139881191817 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855383351173 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267741927918 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601807771865 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.