TPO25- Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In the reading passage, the author feels that are three possible explanations for the no use of vessels as electric batteries. However, finding all these ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text and states some evidence to the contrary.
To begin with, the writer posits that do not have evidence that any metal wires were located near the vessels. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She is of the opinion that these vessels were discovered by local people not for archaeologists. As a result, in her view evidences, such as metal wires would be modificated.
Secondly, the author suggests that the copper cylinders inside the jars was probably used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, not for generating electricity. In contrast, the lecture rebuts this by mentioning that the main purpose of the jars would be changed with the discover of the iron and others materials. Hence, she argues that is possible that the jars used to be used for electricity sources.
Finally, the reading believe that batteries provide from the vessels would have been completely useless the people in this period. But, the lecture claims that the energy from the jars used to be used as a magical power and even for medical purposes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
- TPO19 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 71
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- TPO29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 68
- TPO9 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of p 3
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a result, in her view evidences, such as metal wires would be modificated. Sec...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs inside the jars was probably used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, not for...
^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rpose of the jars would be changed with the discover of the iron and others materials. Hence...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. Finally, the reading believe that batteries provide from the vessels would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03738317757 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64391846132 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1724768919 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410435098302 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133770588176 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789664662961 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216665963929 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410196264249 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a result, in her view evidences, such as metal wires would be modificated. Sec...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs inside the jars was probably used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, not for...
^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rpose of the jars would be changed with the discover of the iron and others materials. Hence...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. Finally, the reading believe that batteries provide from the vessels would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03738317757 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64391846132 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1724768919 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410435098302 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133770588176 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789664662961 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216665963929 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410196264249 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.